Experienced Lecturer v Educated Lecturer

"knp lecturer kamu tu xbgtau sume tu kt kamu??? sbb dorg xtau...lecturer kamu tu blajar tinggi mane je..mane dorg tau sume tu" by Dr X...

salam sume, hmmm...by looking ayat kt atas tu je kamu dh tau pe maksud die kn??? this is what happend right now...ak wt post nie bkn lah nk aibkn org...kalo ak nk aibkn org tu, mmg ak letak name die bsr2...tp COME ON r lecturers!!!! kamo tu leturer, tp...adeh....

cmnie r lebih kurang kisah die:

ad 2 groups, lets say team 1: TEAM EDWARD (Experienced Lecturer)...and TEAM 2: TEAM JACOB (Educated Lecturer)...2 team nie brkelahi nk tunjukkn mane lebih "HEBAT" dlm 1 bidang tu...TEAM EDWARD nie ckp dorg tu mmg lg HEBAT dlm bidang tu, sbb dorg dh 30++thn dlm bidang tu...TEAM JACOB ni pulak ckp, dorg brhak sbb dorg ak kelulussan (PHD) dlm bidang tu....

BAGI KAMO LA, YG MANE LEBIH "HEBAT"??? 

~~~in my point of view~~~

 TEAM JACOB:

dorg diklas kn dlm Educated Lecturer, mmg ak xnafikan...dorg SANGAT bagus...sume ttg bidang tu dorg dpt level of MASTERY (PHD)...tahu ttg tu, ttg nie... tp 1 THING that they should know.... THEY ONLY GOOD ON THEORIES!!! not more then that....xde experienced, teaching others based on research....  im sorry about this, but this is my point of view... dorg nie shouldn't underestimate lecturers from TEAM EDWARD... ak akui, lecturers from TEAM EDWARD mmg xde eduction level as TEAM JACOB (some of them in MASTER LEVEL) tp they got experience...tu yg brharga....kalo ikotkan, company2 construction kt luar sane tu ...ad ke dorg nk ambik org yg pndai dlm theory je??? ad tu mmg ad, tp sikit je la...xmau nyer die ambik org yg xde experience...sbb theory dgn reality tu lain sngat2....belum tentu pe yg kite blajar, dorg apply kt real field...kn????

TEAM EDWARD quote this 

(dh diubah, supaye ia lebih environmental friendly tp stay on right meaning): 

"baru dpt PHD 2,3 thn...dh ck cm org ad pngalaman 30th"

"walau blja tggi mane pun jgn ingat smua tau"

"sbb blajar kamo jumpe only 1,2 org yg btl tau, tu pon dlm mase blajar je (2-3thn)"

"kalo org ade pengalaman 30thn dlm bidang tu, cube kamo bygkn brape org manusia yg brpengetahuan yg dorg dh jumpe"

".kalo ad "knowledge" pon tp xde "skill" nk apply die on reality pon xde gune gak"

dorg nie experienced leturers...ad pngalaman dlm bidang trlibat 30thn++...mostly education level dorg smpai MASTER....not bad pe....kn??? ad pngalaman n MASTER dlm bidang pegajian...tp dorg direndahkn...sebabnyer, XDE PHD...tu je....dr quotes kt atas tu ak blh conclude kn bbrape point:

1. opinion dorg nie dicangah org lecturers dr TEAM JACOB

2. sbb XDE PHD, so dorg xde hak brckp...

3. btl ckp lecturer yg ajar ak smlm....."kt malaysia nie wujud system kasta"

~~penutup~~

xde pe ak nk ckp sbb tekilan, terkesima dgn "PERANG" 2 team nie....tp bg TEAM JACOB jgnlah trlalu bnggakan sngat PHD kamo tu...ikotkn, ak mmg mnyebelah TEAM EDWARD sbb:

ak bg kamo situasi:

kamo nk g 1 tempat tu..tp kamo xtau....kamo nk tye pd 2 org laki:

situasi 1

kamo: encik blh saye tau cmner kn smapai tempat nie???

laki A: oohhh saye tau tempat nie, kenal sangat...tiap2 hari saye ulang alik kesana..awak gerak lurus, belok kanan..pas 2 km, belok kiri...sampailah...

kamo: terima kasih...

situasi 2

kamo: encik blh saye tau cmner kn smapai tempat nie???

laki B: ermm....saye tau tempat nie...tp saye pernah dengar je la, xpernah pergi....saye rase ak patut gerak lurus, belok kanan..pas 2 km, belok kiri...sampailah...

kamo: terima kasih...

kalo kamu lah yg ade masalah nie...yg mane kamu nk caye??? laki A or laki B...jawapan mane yg bagus??? laki A or laki B???

bg ak ak pilih laki A sbb dorg pernah ke sana, of course lah dorg tau....sbb tu ak pilih TEAM EDWARD

 ak xckp TEAM EDWARD betol sume....depend on lecturer r nk menilai mane yg betol bgs....sye nie yg ad DIPLOMA nie xberhak brcakap...